Olympic Values and Education: an Integrated Strategy for Global Education Reform

Authors

  • Charalampos Kalofonos

Keywords:

Olympic values, digital education, formal education, international diplomas, well-being

Abstract

Education today stands at a critical crossroads. The ongoing digital transformation opens new horizons, yet without a shared value orientation, it risks losing its human core. This study examines the integration of Olympic Values into secondary education worldwide, positioning them as a bridge connecting students and schools across nations and highlighting the potential role of Greece as the birthplace of the ideals that give purpose to technology, meaning to learning, and ethics to progress. By analyzing educational models from countries such as Singapore, the United States, Estonia, Poland, and South Africa, the study demonstrates that the values of excellence, respect, and friendship can serve as anchors of cross-cultural understanding and collaboration. Drawing on four decades of educational psychology research (Deci & Ryan, Dweck, Duckworth, Bandura, Goleman), this underscores that programs that embed values into the learning process accelerate individual well-being and foster global understanding. Furthermore, the proposed Value-Driven Digital Education Framework (VDDEF) has the potential to reduce social inequalities, strengthen international cooperation, and reposition Greece as a global center for value-based education.

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

Binder, D. (2012). Teaching Olympism in schools: Olympic education as a focus on values education. Lausanne: IOC Olympic Studies Centre.

Biesta, G. (2020). World-centred education: A view for the present. Routledge.

CASEL. (2023). What is SEL? Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. https://casel.org

Cardona, R., Rodriguez, L., & Ishmael, A. (2023). Equity and decentralization in U.S. education policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s success. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 1–25.

Dweck, C.S., & Yeager, D.S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496.

Eisenschmidt, E., Ahtiainen, R., Kondratjev, A., & Sillavee, T. (2021). Digital learning in Estonia: National policy and local innovation. Tallinn University Press.

European Commission. (2023). Digital Education Action Plan 2021–2027. Brussels: European Union Publications.

Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory–motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479.

Goh, C.B., & Gopinathan, S. (2008). Education in Singapore: Development and innovation. Singapore: Pearson Education Asia.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

IOC (International Olympic Committee). (2020). Olympic Values Education Programme (OVEP) Toolkit. Lausanne: IOC.

IOC. (2022). Global implementation report on Olympic Education initiatives. Lausanne: IOC Publications.

Published

2025-06-17

How to Cite

Kalofonos, C. (2025). Olympic Values and Education: an Integrated Strategy for Global Education Reform. Exercise and Society, 1, 295–301. Retrieved from https://ojs.itlabs.duth.gr/index.php/ExSoc/article/view/558

Issue

Section

PART II: THE SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE OF THE GRADUATES